This is the song guiding the scene I'm writing right now. Puppies and sunshine all the way.
In a 4-3 decision, the justices said the state's ban on same-sex marriage violates the "fundamental constitutional right to form a family relationship." The ruling is likely to flood county courthouses with applications from couples newly eligible to marry when the decision takes effect in 30 days.
"The California Constitution properly must be interpreted to guarantee this basic civil right to all Californians, whether gay or heterosexual, and to same-sex couples as well as to opposite-sex couples," Chief Justice Ronald George wrote in the majority opinion.
Allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry "will not deprive opposite-sex couples of any rights and will not alter the legal framework of the institution of marriage," George said.
In addition, he said, the current state law, enacted in 1977 and reaffirmed by the voters in 2000, discriminates against same-sex couples on the basis of their sexual orientation - discrimination that the court, for the first time, put in the same legal category as racial or gender bias.
Massachusetts is the only other state whose high court has ruled in favor of same-sex marriage. Federal law denies federal benefits, such as joint income tax filing and Social Security survivors' rights, to same-sex couples who can legally marry in their states, and allows other states to deny recognition to those marriages.
Today's ruling set off a celebration at San Francisco City Hall, where nearly 4,000 same-sex weddings were performed in 2004 before the state high court put a halt to the marriages while challenges to the California law worked their way through the courts. The decision today has no effect on those annulments.
Read the whole story here"I honestly think it's the biggest threat our nation has, even more so than terrorism or Islam."
I find myself at a loss when I hear stuff like this. Firstly because it's so ignorant and ridiculous I'm horrified someone elected to public office would believe such a thing, much less say it out loud.
Secondly because in a time where gays and lesbians face so much hatred for simply being gay, this sort of statement by a public official is terribly irresponsible.
Lastly because - this is what they talk about at public prayer breakfasts now?
A few more gems from this speech:
He should not be hid
He's just too big
In a cloud please come down
I'd put stars at your feet
Put Mars in your head
Show yourself to me
And I'd believe
I'd moan and I'd weep
Fall silent at your speak
I'd burst in
Full to the brim
~Missed~
I was blind
I was lame
I was nothing
'Till you came
You said "Babe,
Make you sing
Make you feel
Like some queen"
~Hook~
And listen to the wind blow
And listen to the wind
And listen to the wind blow
She dreamt of children's voices
And torture on the wheel
Patron Saint of nothing
A woman of the hills
She once was a lady
Of pleasure and high born
A lady of the city
But now she sits and moans
~The Wind~
Do you remember the first kiss?
Stars shooting across the sky
To come to such a place as this
You never left my mind
I'm watching from the wall
As in the streets we fight
This world all gone to war
All I need is you tonight
~One Line~
I can't express how offensive it is to me to spend 42 Million dollars to send out a letter to people telling them they'll be expecting a "rebate" from the US government - actually apparently it says the "rebate" is from George Bush, which is also offensive as well as stupid. It's bad enough this is the kind of thing substituting for real economic development from our government but to waste time and money to send a note about it too? That's beyond offensive and wasteful.